None

Jan 26, 2026 08:11 PM COMPLETED
10
Messages Found
10
Analyzed by AI
0
Relevant Results

Relevant Results

Showing 10 results
NOT RELEVANT

Re: Who to Strike Psych - McDonald, Smith or Yanez

"Nooshin Dalili" Jan 19, 2026

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding ALL messages from expert 'smith'. The message is from 'Nooshin Dalili', not from anyone named 'smith'. While the message mentions 'Meredith B Smith Ph.D.' in the original inquiry being responded to, this is only a brief reference in context of discussing which psychiatric evaluator to strike, and the message itself is not from the expert 'smith' that the user is seeking messages from.

"Nooshin Dalili" Date: January 19, 2026 3:15:00 PM Subject: Re: Who to Strike Psych - McDonald, Smith or Yanez Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Nooshin Dalili Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I've had one report from Dr. McDonald for a security guard who was assaulted by an assailant and developed PTSD. He provided a GAF of 59 /17% WPI, which was Okay, and he was supportive of ongoing treatment. I would not strike him. Nooshin Dalili SJO -----Original Message----- From: sellnout@yahoo.com Sent: January 16, 2026 1:03:00 PM To: lawnet@lists.trialsmith.com Subject: Who to Strike Psych - McDonald, Smith or Yanez Who to strike for client with failed back and need for therapy as consequence of industrial injury. Bobbie L McDonald Psy. DMeredith B Smith Ph.D.Muriel Yanez, Psy.D Steve FosterSiles & Foster, P.C.Chico, CA

Message ID: 21958254
NOT RELEVANT

Re: Anything new on Kelsi Smith or Michael Rosson, DC?

"Nooshin Dalili" Jan 15, 2026

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding ALL messages from expert 'smith'. While the message discusses Dr. Kelsi Smith, it is authored by Nooshin Dalili, not by someone named 'smith'. The user is specifically looking for messages FROM a person named 'smith', and this message is from a different author discussing someone else who happens to have Smith as a last name.

"Nooshin Dalili" Date: January 15, 2026 1:38:00 PM Subject: Re: Anything new on Kelsi Smith or Michael Rosson, DC? Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Nooshin Dalili Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Update on Dr. Kelsi Smith, DC: I received a final report from her. She provided reasonable/Ok permanent disability ratings for the lumbar and cervical spine based on DRE, and for the shoulders based on range of motion. The report does not include a pain rating or any discussion of Kite. Apportionment was 100% industrial and she was very generous on future medical. Overall, it is a reasonable report, though it could have been stronger. Based on this experience, I would not strike her, but she would not necessarily be my first choice. Nooshin Dalili SJO -----Original Message----- From: nooshin@dalililaw.com Sent: February 22, 2024 6:50:00 PM To: lawnet@lists.trialsmith.com Subject: Anything new on Kelsi Smith or Michael Rosson, DC? Hi all, I have a panel with 2 unknown DC QMEs, Dr. Smith and Dr. Rosson. According to prior posts, they were both unknown as of few months ago. Has anyone received a report from them in the last few months? Any updates on the prior comments? Thank you, Nooshin Dalili SJO

Message ID: 21950796
NOT RELEVANT

Re: Need copy of a case

"Philip McGuire" Nov 14, 2025

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding messages from 'smith'. The message is from Philip McGuire, not from anyone named Smith. The content is just a brief thank you message that provides no substantive information and is not from the requested author.

Thanks Hollie.  Phil McGuire.

Message ID: 21822247
NOT RELEVANT

Who to Strike Psych - McDonald, Smith or Yanez

"Tim W. English" Jan 18, 2026

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding messages from 'smith'. The message is from Tim W. English, not from anyone named Smith. While the subject line mentions 'Smith' as one of three names in a discussion about who to strike for psych evaluations, this is not a message FROM Smith but rather a message that only mentions Smith in passing. Since the user specifically wants messages FROM the expert Smith, this message does not meet that criteria.

Tim W. English, Esq. Founding Shareholder Wiesner English, P.C. 1660 Hamilton Ave., STE 206 San Jose, CA 95125 TEL: (408) 889-5598 FAX: (408) 889-1813 tim@weworkinjury.com AVVO Profile ** PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW SUITE NUMBER - 206 ** If you or your family have suffered loss due to a work injury and have a child in or applying for college, please click here to learn about Kids' Chance scholarship opportunities . LEGAL NOTICE: This email contains privileged, confidential information only for the intended recipient. If you received in error, any dissemination, distribution or copy of this email message, contents, or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us by email then destroy any copies you possess. Until and unless an attorney-client agreement has been mutually executed by sender and recipient, no information contained in this email shall constitute legal advice.

Message ID: 21956751
NOT RELEVANT

Who to Strike Psych - McDonald, Smith or Yanez

"Steve Foster" Jan 16, 2026

AI Analysis:

This message does not answer the user's question about finding messages from 'smith'. The message is from 'Steve Foster', not from anyone named 'smith'. While the message mentions 'Smith' in the subject line as one of three experts to potentially strike (McDonald, Smith or Yanez), this is merely mentioning the name rather than being authored by someone named Smith. Since the user specifically requested messages FROM the expert 'smith', only messages authored by that person would be relevant.

Who to strike for client with failed back and need for therapy as consequence of industrial injury.

Message ID: 21953722
NOT RELEVANT

Re: San Jose chiro panel - Kelsi Smith- Nicolas Borovsky or Dana Robinson

"Joann Attard-Helvig" Dec 02, 2025

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding ALL messages from expert 'smith'. The message is from Joann Attard-Helvig, not from anyone named 'smith'. While the message mentions 'Kelsi Smith' in the subject line and content, it is not FROM smith - it is discussing Dr. Kelsi Smith as a third party. Since the REAL question specifically asks for messages FROM expert smith, and this message is authored by a different person, it does not meet the criteria.

"Joann Attard-Helvig" Date: December 02, 2025 2:51:00 PM Subject: Re: San Jose chiro panel - Kelsi Smith- Nicolas Borovsky or Dana Robinson Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Joann Attard-Helvig Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Hi everyone, I received additional info on Borovsky. He is with Sharp Medical Evaluators and they tend to do a good job in general. If he ends up being the Panel doc, I'll follow up with more info. Thank you, Joanne Helvig -----Original Message----- From: maddogbab@aol.com Sent: November 14, 2025 1:22:00 PM To: lawnet@lists.trialsmith.com Subject: Re: San Jose chiro panel - Kelsi Smith- Nicolas Borovsky or Dana Robinson All unknown to me. Mad Dog On Friday, November 14, 2025 at 11:15:41 AM PST, Joann Attard-Helvig (lawnet listserver) <listsender-lawnet@lawnet.caaa.org> wrote: ' List: lawnet Sent By: Joann Attard-Helvig ' ' Reply To Sender ' Reply To List ' Search ' Settings ' Hi listmates, I received this Chiro panel of largely Unknown's. Someone had mentioned that Kelsi Smith gave them two good initial reports, but I don't see any mention of final reports. Does anyone have any experience with these doctors? Did anyone receive a final report from Dr. Smith yet? Thank you! Joanne Helvig

Message ID: 21855735
NOT RELEVANT

Re: DA STRIKE TWICE ON PANEL.

"Diep Nguyen" Nov 20, 2025

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding messages from 'smith'. The message is from 'Diep Nguyen', not from anyone named 'smith'. Since the user specifically requested messages from 'smith' and this message is from a different person entirely, it is not relevant to their request.

Diep Nguyen, Attorney At Law

Message ID: 21835226
NOT RELEVANT

Re: DA STRIKE TWICE ON PANEL.

"M. Hollie Rutkowski" Nov 20, 2025

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding messages from expert 'smith'. The message is from 'M. Hollie Rutkowski', not from anyone named 'smith'. Since the user specifically wants messages from a person named 'smith', and this message is from a different author entirely, it is not relevant to their request.

Thank you Leslie.  Would you kind enough to send me these two cases.

Message ID: 21835045
NOT RELEVANT

Re: DA STRIKE TWICE ON PANEL.

"M. Hollie Rutkowski" Nov 20, 2025

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding messages from expert 'smith'. The message is from 'M. Hollie Rutkowski', not from anyone named 'smith'. Since the user specifically wants messages from a person named 'smith', and this message is from a different author entirely, it is not relevant to their request.

Thank you Leslie.  Would you kind enough to send me these two cases.

Message ID: 21834996
NOT RELEVANT

Re: Need copy of a case

"M. Hollie Rutkowski" Nov 14, 2025

AI Analysis:

This message does not help answer the user's question about finding ALL messages from expert 'smith'. The message is from 'M. Hollie Rutkowski', not from anyone named 'smith'. The author's name does not contain 'smith' in either first or last name, so this message does not match the criteria of being from the requested expert.

Thank you Bob.  Phil McGuire.

Message ID: 21822199