AI Analysis:
The message clearly discusses 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context as a psychiatric treating physician. The conversation is specifically about 'psych treater' recommendations, with Scott Ford stating 'I like Musher the best on that list' and Anthony Polakov confirming 'Musher is good.' This is clearly about the doctor as a treating physician, not a law firm reference.
"Scott Ford" Date: January 14, 2026 1:11:00 PM Subject: Re: psych treater Reply to list Reply to sender Print I agree. I like Musher the best on that list. Goodman can be problematic. From: Anthony S. Polakov (scaaa listserver) <listsender-scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:09 AM To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: Re:[scaaa] psych treater List: scaaa Sent By: Anthony S. Polakov Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Musher is good. Anthony S. Polakov, Esq. Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov, APC 11620 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310)996-7500 (310)575-4353 Fax apolakov@stolllaw.com Please take notice that Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov is under a mandatory work from home order due to the Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, our physical office is closed and all employees are working remotely in hopes of doing our part to slow the spread of COVID-19. We ask that all correspondence, pleadings, discovery and/or other communications be electronically sent via email, dropbox, or other electronic means to mail@stolllaw.com until further notice. Any communications sent via U.S. Mail, and/or personal or overnight delivery will encounter significant delays in receipt because all mail will be forwarded and remotely processed . These delays can be avoided by sending all communications by email, dropbox and/or other electronic means to the following address: mail@stolllaw.com . PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS : 11620 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90025 310.996.7500 office 310.575.4353 fax From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) <listsender-scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:08 AM To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: [scaaa] psych treater Importance: High List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who is best to treat with on admitted psych claim? Frank Lin Stanley Goodman Gennady Musher Perry Maloff James Pratty Sukhdeep Grewal ANY INFO WOULD BE SPPRECIATED James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #388 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213.251.5900 P 213.386.2751 F
AI Analysis:
Message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' by full name in a medical context as part of a 'Psyche Panel' discussion, with a direct opinion stating 'Gennady Musher is good.' This is clearly about the doctor as a treating physician, not a law firm reference.
Gennady Musher is good. Marissa Caudill is not good. Not familiar with Tang.
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Gennady Musher' as a PTP (Primary Treating Physician) in a medical/legal context. Attorney Brian Grafstrom states he 'had one case each with Welty (PQME) and Musher (PTP)' and provides specific feedback that he 'Got a good report from Welty and a great report from Musher. Musher's report shot-down D's GFPA defense.' This is clearly about the doctor as a treating physician with detailed opinions about their performance.
bay25th Date: March 07, 2017 10:58:00 PM Subject: Re: Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Jamey Teitell Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings dont strike Hallbridge Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Jack M. Goldfarb (scaaa listserver)" <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> Date: 3/7/17 5:59 PM (GMT-08:00) To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: Re: [scaaa] Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Thanks that's very helpful Sent from my iPhone On Mar 7, 2017, at 5:17 PM, Brian Grafstrom (scaaa listserver) < listsender@lawnet.caaa.org > wrote: List: scaaa Sent By: Brian Grafstrom Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I’ve had one case each with Welty (PQME) and Musher (PTP). Got a good report from Welty and a great report from Musher. Musher’s report shot-down D’s GFPA defense. I’ve not heard of Elmashat. Brian A. Grafstrom Attorney at Law Workers’ Compensation | Personal Injury ROSE, KLEIN & MARIAS, LLP 801 S. Grand Ave., 11 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 626-0571 – Tel. (213) 623-7755 – Fax From: Jack M. Goldfarb (scaaa listserver) [mailto: listsender@lawnet.caaa.org ] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 4:21 PM To: SCAAA Chapter Subject: Re: [scaaa] Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who to strike on a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury. This is a side panel: Anne Welty, Ashraf Elmashat, or Gennady Musher Sent from my iPhone
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Gennady Musher' as a PTP (Primary Treating Physician) in a medical/legal context. Attorney Brian Grafstrom states he 'had one case each with Welty (PQME) and Musher (PTP)' and provides positive feedback saying he 'Got a good report from Welty and a great report from Musher. Musher's report shot-down D's GFPA defense.' This is clearly about the doctor as a treating physician, not a law firm reference.
Jack Goldfarb Date: March 07, 2017 7:59:00 PM Subject: Re: Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Thanks that's very helpful Sent from my iPhone On Mar 7, 2017, at 5:17 PM, Brian Grafstrom (scaaa listserver) < listsender@lawnet.caaa.org > wrote: List: scaaa Sent By: Brian Grafstrom Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I’ve had one case each with Welty (PQME) and Musher (PTP). Got a good report from Welty and a great report from Musher. Musher’s report shot-down D’s GFPA defense. I’ve not heard of Elmashat. Brian A. Grafstrom Attorney at Law Workers’ Compensation | Personal Injury ROSE, KLEIN & MARIAS, LLP 801 S. Grand Ave., 11 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 626-0571 – Tel. (213) 623-7755 – Fax From: Jack M. Goldfarb (scaaa listserver) [mailto: listsender@lawnet.caaa.org ] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 4:21 PM To: SCAAA Chapter Subject: Re: [scaaa] Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who to strike on a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury. This is a side panel: Anne Welty, Ashraf Elmashat, or Gennady Musher Sent from my iPhone
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Musher' as a PTP (Primary Treating Physician) in a medical context. The attorney states he 'Got a good report from Welty and a great report from Musher' and specifically mentions 'Musher's report shot-down D's GFPA defense.' The context is clearly medical/legal evaluation of doctors, and Musher is explicitly identified as a PTP, making this highly relevant for PTP/STP evaluation.
Brian Grafstrom Date: March 07, 2017 7:18:00 PM Subject: RE: Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Brian Grafstrom Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I’ve had one case each with Welty (PQME) and Musher (PTP). Got a good report from Welty and a great report from Musher. Musher’s report shot-down D’s GFPA defense. I’ve not heard of Elmashat. Brian A. Grafstrom Attorney at Law Workers’ Compensation | Personal Injury ROSE, KLEIN & MARIAS, LLP 801 S. Grand Ave., 11 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 626-0571 – Tel. (213) 623-7755 – Fax From: Jack M. Goldfarb (scaaa listserver) [mailto: listsender@lawnet.caaa.org ] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 4:21 PM To: SCAAA Chapter Subject: Re: [scaaa] Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who to strike on a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury. This is a side panel: Anne Welty, Ashraf Elmashat, or Gennady Musher Sent from my iPhone
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Musher' as a doctor in a medical/legal context. The attorney states 'Musher is applicant-oriented' and 'Have used him many times before. You won't be disappointed.' This is clearly referring to a physician the attorney has worked with professionally, providing a direct opinion about the doctor's orientation and reliability as a treating physician.
Mark Malter Date: July 01, 2016 5:49:00 PM Subject: Re: Sanathara, Musher, Elmashat Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Mark Malter Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Musher is applicant-oriented. Have used him many times before. You won't be disappointed. Mark M. Malter Malter Law Corporation 6400 Canoga Avenue Suite 216 East Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Bus: [818] 888-9300 Fax: [818] 888-9388 Email: MarkMalter@malterlawcorp.com Web: www.MalterLawCorp.com
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Gennady Musher' as a doctor in medical context. Anthony Polakov provides specific feedback about Musher being 'very applicant oriented' and 'a keeper', mentioning he works with 'Pacific Orthopedic and Van Guard Psych'. The original query from Joseph Kritzer asks about striking 'Gennady Musher' in what appears to be a QME (Qualified Medical Examiner) context. This is clearly about the doctor as a treating physician, not a law firm reference.
Thanks, Joe Kritzer Torrance, Ca From: apolakov@stolllaw.com To: lawnet@lawnet.caaa.org Subject: RE: [lawnet] Psyche QME So Cal Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:05:40 +0000 List: lawnet Sent by: Anthony S. Polakov Search Musher is very applicant oriented. He is with Pacific Orthopedic and Van Guard Psych. He is a keeper. Anthony S. Polakov, Esq. Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov, APC 11601 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310)996-7500 (310)575-4353 Fax apolakov@stolllaw.com From: JOSEPH KRITZER [mailto:jkritzer@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:41 PM To: Statewide List Service Subject: [lawnet] Psyche QME So Cal Importance: Low List: lawnet Sent by: Joseph Kritzer Search Who should I strike? 1. Gennady Musher 2. Jennifer O'Day Thanks for all reponses. Joe Kritzer Torrance, Ca _.___.__ _.___.__
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Musher' as a doctor in medical context. Anthony Polakov provides specific feedback about Musher being 'very applicant oriented' and mentions his medical affiliations with 'Pacific Orthopedic and Van Guard Psych', calling him 'a keeper'. This is clearly about Gennady Musher as a treating physician, not a law firm reference.
Anthony Polakov Date: April 18, 2013 3:02:00 PM Subject: RE: Psyche QME So Cal Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent by: Anthony S. Polakov Search Musher is very applicant oriented. He is with Pacific Orthopedic and Van Guard Psych. He is a keeper. Anthony S. Polakov, Esq. Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov, APC 11601 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310)996-7500 (310)575-4353 Fax apolakov@stolllaw.com From: JOSEPH KRITZER [mailto:jkritzer@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:41 PM To: Statewide List Service Subject: [lawnet] Psyche QME So Cal Importance: Low List: lawnet Sent by: Joseph Kritzer Search Who should I strike? 1. Gennady Musher 2. Jennifer O'Day Thanks for all reponses. Joe Kritzer Torrance, Ca _.___.__
AI Analysis:
Message clearly discusses 'Musher' as a doctor in medical context - mentions he is with Pacific Ortho group, describes him as 'very app. oriented' (appointment oriented), and recommends using him. This is clearly about the physician 'musher' as a treating doctor, not a law firm reference.
Musher is with the Pac. Ortho group. He is very app. oriented. Use him in a second.
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context - specifically in a list of doctors being considered for treating an admitted psychiatric claim. Additionally, Brian Grafstrom responds 'I like Musher', providing a positive opinion about this doctor as a treating physician. The context is clearly medical/treatment-related, not legal.
"Brian A. Grafstrom" Date: January 14, 2026 3:41:00 PM Subject: Re: psych treater Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Brian Grafstrom Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I like Musher. From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) <listsender-scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:08 AM To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: [scaaa] psych treater Importance: High List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who is best to treat with on admitted psych claim? Frank Lin Stanley Goodman Gennady Musher Perry Maloff James Pratty Sukhdeep Grewal ANY INFO WOULD BE SPPRECIATED James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #388 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213.251.5900 P 213.386.2751 F
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Dr. Musher' in a medical context - Harry Samarghachian is recommending Dr. Musher as a psychiatric treater in response to James Malkin's question about who is best to treat with on an admitted psych claim. The name appears as 'Gennady Musher' in the original list of potential doctors, and the recommendation 'use Dr. Musher' directly refers to this doctor in a treating physician context.
"Harry Samarghachian" Date: January 14, 2026 2:26:00 PM Subject: Re: psych treater Reply to list Reply to sender Print James, use Dr. Musher. Harry Samarghachian ROSE, KLEIN & MARIAS LLP 801 S. Grand Ave., Floor 11 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: (213) 626-0571 | Fax: (213) 623-7755 Workers’ Compensation | Personal Injury | Employment Law This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you received this email in error, please delete it from your system without copying, distributing or using information and notify sender by return email. From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) <listsender-scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:08 AM To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: [scaaa] psych treater Importance: High List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who is best to treat with on admitted psych claim? Frank Lin Stanley Goodman Gennady Musher Perry Maloff James Pratty Sukhdeep Grewal ANY INFO WOULD BE SPPRECIATED James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #388 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213.251.5900 P 213.386.2751 F
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context as one of several doctors being recommended for treating an admitted psychiatric claim. This is a direct recommendation about the doctor as a treating physician, not a law firm reference. The response 'Musher is good' provides a positive opinion about this doctor's capabilities as a treater.
"Anthony Polakov" Date: January 14, 2026 1:10:00 PM Subject: Re: psych treater Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Anthony S. Polakov Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Musher is good. Anthony S. Polakov, Esq. Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov, APC 11620 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310)996-7500 (310)575-4353 Fax apolakov@stolllaw.com Please take notice that Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov is under a mandatory work from home order due to the Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, our physical office is closed and all employees are working remotely in hopes of doing our part to slow the spread of COVID-19. We ask that all correspondence, pleadings, discovery and/or other communications be electronically sent via email, dropbox, or other electronic means to mail@stolllaw.com until further notice. Any communications sent via U.S. Mail, and/or personal or overnight delivery will encounter significant delays in receipt because all mail will be forwarded and remotely processed . These delays can be avoided by sending all communications by email, dropbox and/or other electronic means to the following address: mail@stolllaw.com . PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS : 11620 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90025 310.996.7500 office 310.575.4353 fax From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) <listsender-scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:08 AM To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: [scaaa] psych treater Importance: High List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who is best to treat with on admitted psych claim? Frank Lin Stanley Goodman Gennady Musher Perry Maloff James Pratty Sukhdeep Grewal ANY INFO WOULD BE SPPRECIATED James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #388 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213.251.5900 P 213.386.2751 F
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher, MD' in a medical context as part of a psychiatric panel discussion among attorneys. The context shows lawyers discussing which doctors to strike from a panel, with one attorney specifically asking for information about striking doctors including Musher. This is clearly about the doctor in a professional medical capacity, not a law firm name.
Jack Goldfarb Date: March 11, 2021 8:26:00 PM Subject: Re: psych panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I miss all you guys. Although I don’t miss the work. I don’t need to work anymore since you and Larry are supporting me. When things clear up I am hoping to attend one of our conventions. I’d like to make time to have a drink or even meal together. Be well. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 11, 2021, at 6:19 PM, James Malkin (scaaa listserver) wrote: > > Thanks Jack. I did strike him. Glad to hear from you after more than one year of retirement. Good memory. Be well! > On Mar 11, 2021 6:13 PM, "Jack M. Goldfarb (scaaa listserver)" wrote: > > > Stay away from Sherman five years ago he buried my client on a case. I don’t know if his change stripes but I doubt it. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 11, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Kenneth B. Fram (scaaa listserver) wrote: >> >> >> List: scaaa Sent By: Kenneth B. Fram >> Reply To Sender >> Reply To List >> Search >> Settings >> >> Gennady Musher is Applicant >> >> Kenneth B. Fram >> Attorney at Law >> (323) 930-8833 >> (323) 930-8840 fax >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) >> To: SCAAA Chapter >> Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 2:44 pm >> Subject: [scaaa] psych panel >> >> List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin >> Reply To Sender >> Reply To List >> Search >> Settings >> >> Anybody have any information on who to strike? >> >> Stephanie Eric Johnson, MD >> Dmitriy Sherman, MD >> Gennady Musher, MD >> >> Please help!! >> >> James M. Malkin >> Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel >> 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #460 >> Los Angeles, CA. 90010 >> 213-251-5900 >> 213-386-2750 fax >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ---- end of message ---- > ---- end of message ----
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher, MD' in a medical context as part of a psychology panel discussion. The name match is valid as it includes both first and last name with MD designation, and the context involves attorneys discussing which doctors to potentially strike from a panel, indicating this is about the doctor's professional medical practice.
Brian Grafstrom Date: March 11, 2021 4:54:00 PM Subject: RE: psych panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Brian Grafstrom Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Keep Musher. From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) [mailto: listsender@lawnet.caaa.org ] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 2:44 PM To: SCAAA Chapter Subject: [scaaa] psych panel Importance: High List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Anybody have any information on who to strike? Stephanie Eric Johnson, MD Dmitriy Sherman, MD Gennady Musher, MD Please help!! James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #460 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213-251-5900 213-386-2750 fax
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Musher' in a clear medical context alongside other doctors (Stephane Johnson and Sherman) who are being discussed for writing medical reports. The phrase 'No experience with Musher' indicates this is about a doctor being evaluated for medical report writing capabilities, which is directly relevant to PTP/STP evaluation.
Keep Stephane Johnson. He writes good reports for us. I recently received a solid report from Sherman, although I had heard he used to lean conservative. No experience with Musher.
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context as a psychiatrist who was struck from a QME (Qualified Medical Examiner) panel. This is directly about the doctor 'musher' in their professional capacity as a treating physician/medical examiner, making it highly relevant for PTP/STP evaluation.
Christopher Tajer Date: September 20, 2019 3:57:00 PM Subject: Choice of 2 good Psych QMEs Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Christopher Tajer Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Defense got a psych panel under 4060 which is premature and I was about to battle him over it, until I saw the panel. He struck Gennady Musher leaving me with: Carl Marusak Perry Maloff I use Marusak as an AME quite often and the review are good for Maloff as well. Any opinions on one vs. the other? Or just flip a coin? Thanks, Taj
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context as one of three doctors being considered for a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury case. Martin von Mizener also states he has 'had very good results from both Welty and Musher,' providing direct feedback about the doctor's performance as a treating physician.
Martin Vonmizener Date: March 07, 2017 6:31:00 PM Subject: Re: Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Martin Von Mizener Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I have h ad very good results from both Welty and Musher. Martin von Mizener -----Original Message----- From: Jack M. Goldfarb (scaaa listserver) <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Tue, Mar 7, 2017 4:21 pm Subject: Re: [scaaa] Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who to strike on a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury. This is a side panel: Anne Welty, Ashraf Elmashat, or Gennady Musher Sent from my iPhone
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context discussing who to strike (likely from a medical panel) for a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury case. The full name 'Gennady Musher' clearly matches the doctor being evaluated, and the context is medical rather than legal.
Jack Goldfarb Date: March 07, 2017 6:21:00 PM Subject: Re: Who to strike? Steiger, Halbridge, Williamson Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Jack M. Goldfarb Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who to strike on a catastrophic musculoskeletal injury. This is a side panel: Anne Welty, Ashraf Elmashat, or Gennady Musher Sent from my iPhone
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' as one of three 'psychiatric PQMEs' (Qualified Medical Evaluators), which is a medical context. The sender is asking for information about these doctors, indicating this is about Musher as a treating physician. The name match is valid as it's the full name in a medical evaluation context.
Greg Santiago Date: July 01, 2016 6:38:00 PM Subject: Re: Sanathara, Musher, Elmashat Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Gregory N. Santiago Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Musher is an applicant treater. Greg Santiago, Esq. 3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #440 Los Angeles, CA. 90034 Office: (310)473-2355 Fax: (310)478-2682 Email: gregsantiago@msn.com Website: dyslawgroup.com On Jul 1, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Martin Von Mizener (scaaa listserver) < listsender@lawnet.caaa.org > wrote: List: scaaa Sent By: Martin Von Mizener Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Dear all, Three psychiatric PQMEs, all completely unknown to me: Visant Sanathara, Gennady Musher, Ashraf Elmashat. Any ideas? Thanx in advance, Martin von Mizener _.___.__
AI Analysis:
Message clearly mentions 'Dr Musher' in a medical context where the attorney is selecting him from the MPN (Medical Provider Network) for a psychiatry consultation for their client. This is explicitly about Dr. Musher as a treating physician (STP) being chosen for a psychiatric evaluation, making it highly relevant for PTP/STP evaluation purposes.
Susan Lavian Date: March 15, 2016 11:57:00 AM Subject: Need advice please... 2nd time posting.. Conference next week Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Susan Lavian Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings My client was diagnosed with hyperacusis in his left ear. 1. The PTP, an ENT, requested authorization for tinnitus retraining therapy. UR doc an internist, denied treatment. I objected on the basis the UR doc was not an ENT. The denial of therapy was upheld by IMR. I filed DOR. The adjuster then asks the PTP to resubmit the request for authorization and UR denies again but this time the doctor is an ENT. Is this valid? 2. The PTP also requests authorization for a psychiatry consult now. I choose Dr Musher from the MPN and advise def atty and adjuster they need to provide authorization to Dr. Musher for an appt. A week later I get notice that the defense is sending my client to Dr. Jerome Franklin for the consult. Doesn't LC 4600 permit the applicant to choose the psyche? Thanks. Susan Lavian
AI Analysis:
Message clearly mentions 'Dr Musher' in a medical context where the attorney chose this doctor from the MPN (Medical Provider Network) for a psychiatry consultation. The context is specifically about medical treatment authorization and physician selection, making this highly relevant for evaluating Dr. Musher as a treating physician.
Susan Lavian Date: March 14, 2016 4:51:00 PM Subject: UR Denial and Request for consult in RFA Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Susan Lavian Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I have two issues on my case. Conference is scheduled next week. My client was diagnosed with hyperacusis in his left ear. 1. The PTP, an ENT, requested authorization for tinnitus retraining therapy. UR doc an internist, denied treatment. I objected on the basis the UR doc was not an ENT. The denial of therapy was upheld by IMR. DOR filed. The adjuster then asks the PTP to resubmit the request for authorization and UR denies again but this time the doctor is an ENT. Is this valid? 2. This time the PTP also requests authorization for a psychiatry consult. I choose Dr Musher from the MPN and advise def atty and adjuster they need to provide authorization to Dr. Musher for an appt. A week later I get notice that the defense is sending my client to Dr. Jerome Franklin for the consult. Doesn't LC 4600 permit the applicant to choose the psyche? Thanks. Susan Lavian
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a list of MPN psyche treaters and later refers to 'Musher' in the context of medical treatment ('ask her to refer to Musher for Meds'). This is explicitly about selecting a psychiatrist as a PTP (Primary Treating Physician), making it highly relevant for evaluating Musher as a treating physician.
ron ehrman Date: February 04, 2016 7:38:00 PM Subject: Re: Need Help selecting psyche PTP please Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: ron ehrman Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings You hit the Motherlode. Konstat, Maibaum, Musher, Lamm in order of quality of reporting. Lamm best Treater by far as a sympathetic voice. You might want to go w/ Lamm and ask her to refer to Musher for Meds. Do you have AME/PQME ? Sounds like new case under delay. Psyche cases get immediate denials. May want to either object to you own 1st report to get psychology panel(we had this discussion before) 16 d later or look out for denial and get PSY. Then if you really want to ice the cake, Ask PSY PQME in letter or depo if Applicant needs referral to chiro for cold shoulder. As we say in NY, "Joke 'em if they cant take a F$%#!" Does quality of reporting matter more quality than TX? Where's my love? We not Bud's anymore? You owe me a ph. call. rpe los angeles -----Original Message----- From: agc@cozzagliolaw.com Sent: February 04, 2016 6:02:58 PM To: lawnet@lists.trialsmith.com Subject: Need Help selecting psyche PTP please List Mates, MPN psyche treaters are marsha Lamm, Elena Konstat, Matthew Maibaum, Pavaninder Mann, William Boehm, Jack Rothberg, Rajendra Patel, Gennady Musher. Client is a sales person that got great reviews in January 2016 but was fired almost a month later post her asking for a raise. Given the cold shoulder and treated badly until termination date. Who is the best bet for my client as PTP? Thank you in advance. by: Alexander G. Cozzaglio, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER G. COZZAGLIO 6211 Van Nuys Blvd., Suite 200 Van Nuys, CA 91401 agc@cozzagliolaw.com 818-257-8026 818-902-9978 fx Certified Specialist, Workers' Compensation Law CAAA Regular Member The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential and for the intended use of the addressee only; it may also be legally privileged and/or price sensitive. Notice is hereby given that any disclosure, use or copying of the information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be illegal. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'SCIF struck Musher' in the context of discussing psyche PQMEs (Qualified Medical Evaluators), indicating Musher is a doctor who was struck/removed from a case. The context is clearly medical (psychiatric evaluations) and the name appears to refer to a physician, not a law firm.
ron ehrman Date: October 01, 2015 2:21:00 AM Subject: So Cal Psyche PQMEs Allen Lee & Arsalan Malik Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: ron ehrman Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Both in Whittier, but who is the wittiest? FWIW: SCIF struck Musher. Some favorable comments about Lee in archives but all 2+yrs old. Zero on Malik. Any experience , thoughts, gossip? TYIA. ron ehrman los angeles
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context as part of a PQME (Qualified Medical Examiner) panel discussion. The context shows this is about selecting/striking medical examiners, with one party planning to 'strike Musher' and asking about striking other panelists. This is clearly about the doctor 'musher' in a professional medical capacity.
"bay25th@yahoo.com" Date: February 23, 2014 9:16:00 PM Subject: Re: Psych PQME Panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent by: Jamey Teitell Search Strike rothberg Hernandez is good for u Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID "Russell E. Shuben" <rshooby@gmail.com> wrote: List: scaaa Sent by: Russell E. Shuben Search The panelists are: Jack Rothberg Abilio Hernandez Gennady Musher D will strike Musher. Should I strike Hernandez or Rothberg? _.___.__
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Mushers Rx reports' in the context of discussing doctors/physicians. The reference to 'Rx reports' (prescription reports) clearly indicates this is about a doctor in a medical context, and the discussion is comparing different physicians' orientations and backgrounds.
Rothberg is liberal if he's a treater--but seems defense oriented usually. Also pro- prosecution usually in a couple cases I've seen. Jack trained in comp with the late Frank Drucker-- Frank started out as app dr, but had changed to defense a few years later & Jack was there then. (In my building in Santa Monica.) Don't know Hernandez & only seen Mushers Rx reports.
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' as one of three PQME (Panel Qualified Medical Examiner) panelists, and discusses him in a medical/legal context. Brad's comment about 'Musher' being an 'Applicant PTP' (Primary Treating Physician) directly relates to his role as a treating physician. The discussion involves strategic considerations about striking him from a panel, indicating he's being evaluated as a medical professional.
Jack Breslavsky Date: February 20, 2014 7:37:00 PM Subject: Re: Psych PQME Panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent by: Jack Breslavsky Search Don't strike Musher - Rothberg had been terrible as a PQME. At least from my experience Sent from my iPhone On Feb 20, 2014, at 5:00 PM, "Brad" < wixen@sbcglobal.net > wrote: List: scaaa Sent by: Brad Wixen Search Isn't Rothberg trying to market himself as an AME? If so, he will likely at least try to be fair. I don't know the other. Also don't assume that Musher will be favorable. Applicant PTPs sometimes are the worst because they bend over three times backwards to show the other side that they are fair. From: "Russell E. Shuben" < rshooby@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:24:12 -0600 (CST) To: SCAAA Chapter< scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org > ReplyTo: "SCAAA Chapter" < scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org > Subject: [scaaa] Psych PQME Panel List: scaaa Sent by: Russell E. Shuben Search The panelists are: Jack Rothberg Abilio Hernandez Gennady Musher D will strike Musher. Should I strike Hernandez or Rothberg? _.___.__ _.___.__
AI Analysis:
Message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' as one of three panelists in a PQME (Qualified Medical Evaluator) context, and discusses 'Musher' as an applicant PTP (Primary Treating Physician) with specific commentary about his potential bias. The medical context is clear and the discussion is specifically about this doctor's role and behavior as a treating physician.
"Brad" Date: February 20, 2014 7:01:00 PM Subject: Re: Psych PQME Panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent by: Brad Wixen Search Isn't Rothberg trying to market himself as an AME? If so, he will likely at least try to be fair. I don't know the other. Also don't assume that Musher will be favorable. Applicant PTPs sometimes are the worst because they bend over three times backwards to show the other side that they are fair. From: "Russell E. Shuben" <rshooby@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:24:12 -0600 (CST) To: SCAAA Chapter<scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> ReplyTo: "SCAAA Chapter" <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: [scaaa] Psych PQME Panel List: scaaa Sent by: Russell E. Shuben Search The panelists are: Jack Rothberg Abilio Hernandez Gennady Musher D will strike Musher. Should I strike Hernandez or Rothberg? _.___.__
AI Analysis:
Message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a medical context as a panelist for a 'Psych PQME Panel' (Psychiatric Qualified Medical Evaluator Panel). The context indicates this is about selecting medical evaluators, and there's discussion about striking Musher from consideration, which is relevant information about this doctor's involvement in medical evaluations.
"Russell E. Shuben" Date: February 20, 2014 6:24:00 PM Subject: Psych PQME Panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent by: Russell E. Shuben Search The panelists are: Jack Rothberg Abilio Hernandez Gennady Musher D will strike Musher. Should I strike Hernandez or Rothberg?
AI Analysis:
The message lists 'Gennady Musher' among doctors being considered for treating an admitted psych claim. This is clearly a medical context where the sender is asking for recommendations about which doctor would be best to work with. The name appears in a list of physicians, not as part of a law firm name, making this a valid match for the doctor being evaluated.
"James Malkin" Date: January 14, 2026 1:08:00 PM Subject: psych treater Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Who is best to treat with on admitted psych claim? Frank Lin Stanley Goodman Gennady Musher Perry Maloff James Pratty Sukhdeep Grewal ANY INFO WOULD BE SPPRECIATED James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #388 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213.251.5900 P 213.386.2751 F
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Gennady Musher, MD' in a list of doctors being discussed for a 'psych panel' in what appears to be a legal context. Brett Sherry specifically states 'No experience with Musher' when discussing these doctors, indicating this is about Dr. Musher as a treating physician. The context is clearly medical (psychology panel) and the full name with MD credential confirms this is the doctor being evaluated.
James Malkin Date: March 11, 2021 4:51:00 PM Subject: RE: psych panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Thanks Brett James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #460 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213-251-5900 213-386-2750 fax From: Brett Sherry (scaaa listserver) [mailto:listsender@lawnet.caaa.org] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 2:49 PM To: SCAAA Chapter Subject: Re: [scaaa] psych panel List: scaaa Sent By: Brett Sherry Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Keep Stephane Johnson. He writes good reports for us. I recently received a solid report from Sherman, although I had heard he used to lean conservative. No experience with Musher. On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:44 PM James Malkin (scaaa listserver) < listsender@lawnet.caaa.org > wrote: List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Anybody have any information on who to strike? Stephanie Eric Johnson, MD Dmitriy Sherman, MD Gennady Musher, MD Please help!! James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #460 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213-251-5900 213-386-2750 fax -- Very truly yours, Brett T. Sherry Attorney at Law Koszdin, Fields, Sherry & Katz Phone: (818) 781-1503 Fax: (818) 925-7090 brett@koszdin.com
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher, MD' in a medical context as part of a psychiatric panel discussion. The attorney is asking for information about who to strike from a panel that includes Dr. Musher, indicating this is about the doctor's professional capabilities or suitability as a treating physician. The 'MD' designation confirms this is about the doctor, not someone with the same name in a different profession.
KBF Date: March 11, 2021 4:50:00 PM Subject: Re: psych panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Kenneth B. Fram Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Gennady Musher is Applicant Kenneth B. Fram Attorney at Law (323) 930-8833 (323) 930-8840 fax -----Original Message----- From: James Malkin (scaaa listserver) <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> To: SCAAA Chapter <scaaa@lawnet.caaa.org> Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 2:44 pm Subject: [scaaa] psych panel List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Anybody have any information on who to strike? Stephanie Eric Johnson, MD Dmitriy Sherman, MD Gennady Musher, MD Please help!! James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #460 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213-251-5900 213-386-2750 fax
AI Analysis:
Message mentions 'Gennady Musher, MD' in a list of doctors being discussed for a 'psych panel' strike list. The 'MD' designation and medical context (psychology panel) clearly indicates this is about the doctor as a physician, not in any legal context. The sender is asking for information about striking these doctors, which is relevant medical/legal evaluation context.
James Malkin Date: March 11, 2021 4:44:00 PM Subject: psych panel Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: James Malkin Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Anybody have any information on who to strike? Stephanie Eric Johnson, MD Dmitriy Sherman, MD Gennady Musher, MD Please help!! James M. Malkin Goldschmid, Silver & Spindel 4221 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. #460 Los Angeles, CA. 90010 213-251-5900 213-386-2750 fax
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Def struck Musher' in the context of discussing doctors (Bruce Roth & Mark McDonald from LA Psyche). While brief, 'Musher' appears to be referenced as a doctor who was struck from a case, which is relevant information about this physician in a legal/medical context.
"Ron Ehrman" Date: March 29, 2019 6:23:00 PM Subject: LA Psyche's Bruce Roth & Mark McDonald Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Ronald P. Ehrman Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Some mildly positive comments re: McDonald; Archives silent on Roth. FWIW: Def struck Musher. TYIA for any current info. -- Ron Ehrman, Esq. https://www.ronehrmanlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF RONALD P. EHRMAN 1930 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 505 Los Angeles, CA 90057 213.483.6300 tel 213.483.6303 fax rpe@ronehrmanlaw.com This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Def struck Musher' in the context of discussing doctors (Bruce Roth & Mark McDonald from LA Psyche). While brief, 'Musher' appears to be referenced as a doctor who was struck/challenged by the defense, which is relevant information about this physician in a legal/medical context.
"Ron Ehrman" Date: March 29, 2019 6:23:00 PM Subject: LA Psyche's Bruce Roth & Mark McDonald Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lavaaa Sent By: ron ehrman Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Some mildly positive comments re: McDonald; Archives silent on Roth. FWIW: Def struck Musher. TYIA for any current info. -- Ron Ehrman, Esq. https://www.ronehrmanlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF RONALD P. EHRMAN 1930 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 505 Los Angeles, CA 90057 213.483.6300 tel 213.483.6303 fax rpe@ronehrmanlaw.com This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a list of psychiatrists that the attorney is asking for guidance about for a workers' compensation case. The context clearly identifies Musher as a psychiatrist (medical doctor), and the attorney is seeking information about this doctor's suitability for a case, which is relevant for PTP/STP evaluation.
I know NONE of these psychiatrists on an important (friend), signficant (maybe PTD) case. Any guidance would be appreciated. [alegria] MAURICE L. ABARR - LAWYER, INC. 201 E. Sandpointe Ave., Suite 480 Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714) 543-8416 Tel (714) 641-4809 Fax Certified Specialist, Workers' Compensation Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Accredited Attorney for Veterans Appealing VA Decisions www.abarrlaw.com "Find out just what any people will quietly submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them.” -- Frederick Douglass "A different frame doesn't change the picture per se but it changes how we look at the picture." -- Holiday Mathis THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS E-MAIL IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL E-MAIL MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Gennady Musher' by full name in a clear medical context - specifically identifying him as one of three 'psychiatric PQMEs' (Psychiatric Qualified Medical Evaluators). The sender is asking colleagues for information about these doctors, which is directly relevant to evaluating Musher as a treating physician. While there's no detailed feedback about his performance, the mention is clearly about him as a medical professional.
Steve Scardino Date: July 02, 2016 1:05:00 PM Subject: Re: Sanathara, Musher, Elmashat Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Steven Scardino Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Keep musher Sent from my iPhone On Jul 1, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Martin Von Mizener (scaaa listserver) > wrote: List: scaaa Sent By: Martin Von Mizener Reply To Sender Reply To List Search<<a href="http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsSd38Od6Qm71P2barwUTsSztxZNBcQsCzBASztxZNBBZ5USztxZNBcQsCzBwSztVdyXbbapKBJyxa5gkhYGvFzBPp7OF-CendFEIKK3xP_nV6XWaadSeLsKCCUDO9EVpd7atSk-EyCJtdmVEVhVkffGhBrwqrhdL6XCXCM0lJTu00U1vmtl9b4jGvIr4Pp2Hsbunh73HFCzBV4Ky-OMMqerzwkvFw6ZrtTw09J5xdUsrdbtbrKCBQQg36MSpfoW0pEw6SW4_y0pEw6zRtEjSpJBYTvhJHkLmTTVd" target="_blank">http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsSd38Od6Qm71P2barwUTsSztxZNBcQsCzBASztxZNBBZ5USztxZNBcQsCzBwSztVdyXbbapKBJyxa5gkhYGvFzBPp7OF-CendFEIKK3xP_nV6XWaadSeLsKCCUDO9EVpd7atSk-EyCJtdmVEVhVkffGhBrwqrhdL6XCXCM0lJTu00U1vmtl9b4jGvIr4Pp2Hsbunh73HFCzBV4Ky-OMMqerzwkvFw6ZrtTw09J5xdUsrdbtbrKCBQQg36MSpfoW0pEw6SW4_y0pEw6zRtEjSpJBYTvhJHkLmTTVd> Settings<<a href="http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6xASyMUeohpjs76XCQrIfKcFCzAQsICQrIfKcILEL6QrIfKcFCzAQsI6QrL9InpppjdQJIk9gG2yfBjZcsKr8-lfQNOVJd5BRMsevW_8TvhhhKNRXBQQT4-hd7b9EVjKODR4kRHFGTd7afaxVZicHs3jqpJUTsTsS02JKXM070bWPGF9oysvaAPcLcv5E-wxqsGMefBioNYVOwhEr8lrxrOW8UttcQsL8BQnSm63hPss2zZc0THrKY01dEI9L3zpFrFrtQQKCy0oS6P9X7g3d40STgDYg3d40QuHJ2uPdILCWiue" target="_blank">http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr6xASyMUeohpjs76XCQrIfKcFCzAQsICQrIfKcILEL6QrIfKcFCzAQsI6QrL9InpppjdQJIk9gG2yfBjZcsKr8-lfQNOVJd5BRMsevW_8TvhhhKNRXBQQT4-hd7b9EVjKODR4kRHFGTd7afaxVZicHs3jqpJUTsTsS02JKXM070bWPGF9oysvaAPcLcv5E-wxqsGMefBioNYVOwhEr8lrxrOW8UttcQsL8BQnSm63hPss2zZc0THrKY01dEI9L3zpFrFrtQQKCy0oS6P9X7g3d40STgDYg3d40QuHJ2uPdILCWiue> Dear all, Three psychiatric PQMEs, all completely unknown to me: Visant Sanathara, Gennady Musher, Ashraf Elmashat. Any ideas? Thanx in advance, Martin von Mizener _.___.__
AI Analysis:
The message clearly mentions 'Gennady Musher' by full name in a medical context, specifically identifying him as one of three 'psychiatric PQMEs' (Psychiatric Qualified Medical Evaluators). The sender is asking for information about these doctors, which indicates this is about the doctor as a medical professional, not a law firm reference.
Martin Vonmizener Date: July 01, 2016 5:48:00 PM Subject: Sanathara, Musher, Elmashat Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: scaaa Sent By: Martin Von Mizener Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Dear all, Three psychiatric PQMEs, all completely unknown to me: Visant Sanathara, Gennady Musher, Ashraf Elmashat. Any ideas? Thanx in advance, Martin von Mizener
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a list of MPN (Medical Provider Network) psyche treaters, clearly identifying him as a doctor in a medical context. The attorney is asking for recommendations about which doctor would be the best PTP (Primary Treating Physician) for their client, making this directly relevant to evaluating Musher as a treating physician.
rlp4law Date: February 04, 2016 6:10:00 PM Subject: RE: Need Help selecting psyche PTP please Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Robert L. Palty Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings I have used Lamm. She will work with you and is sympathetic. Robert Palty Encino Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Alex Cozzaglio (lawnet listserver)" <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> Date: 02/04/2016 4:02 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Statewide List Service <lawnet@lawnet.caaa.org> Subject: [lawnet] Need Help selecting psyche PTP please List: lawnet Sent By: Alex Cozzaglio Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings List Mates, MPN psyche treaters are marsha Lamm, Elena Konstat, Matthew Maibaum, Pavaninder Mann, William Boehm, Jack Rothberg, Rajendra Patel, Gennady Musher. Client is a sales person that got great reviews in January 2016 but was fired almost a month later post her asking for a raise. Given the cold shoulder and treated badly until termination date. Who is the best bet for my client as PTP? Thank you in advance. by: Alexander G. Cozzaglio, Esq . LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER G. COZZAGLIO 6211 Van Nuys Blvd., Suite 200 Van Nuys, CA 91401 agc@cozzagliolaw.com 818-257-8026 818-902-9978 fx Certified Specialist, Workers' Compensation Law CAAA Regular Member The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential and for the intended use of the addressee only; it may also be legally privileged and/or price sensitive. Notice is hereby given that any disclosure, use or copying of the information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be illegal. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. _.___.__
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Gennady Musher' in a list of MPN psyche treaters (psychiatrists/psychologists), clearly identifying him as a medical professional. The attorney is asking for recommendations on which doctor would be the best PTP (Primary Treating Physician) for their client's psychological treatment, making this directly relevant to evaluating Musher as a treating physician.
"Alexander Cozzaglio" Date: February 04, 2016 6:03:00 PM Subject: Need Help selecting psyche PTP please Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Alex Cozzaglio Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings List Mates, MPN psyche treaters are marsha Lamm, Elena Konstat, Matthew Maibaum, Pavaninder Mann, William Boehm, Jack Rothberg, Rajendra Patel, Gennady Musher. Client is a sales person that got great reviews in January 2016 but was fired almost a month later post her asking for a raise. Given the cold shoulder and treated badly until termination date. Who is the best bet for my client as PTP? Thank you in advance. by: Alexander G. Cozzaglio, Esq . LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER G. COZZAGLIO 6211 Van Nuys Blvd., Suite 200 Van Nuys, CA 91401 agc@cozzagliolaw.com 818-257-8026 818-902-9978 fx Certified Specialist, Workers' Compensation Law CAAA Regular Member The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential and for the intended use of the addressee only; it may also be legally privileged and/or price sensitive. Notice is hereby given that any disclosure, use or copying of the information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be illegal. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
AI Analysis:
Message mentions 'Gennady Musher' by full name in the context of a 'Psyche QME' (Qualified Medical Evaluator) discussion, which is clearly a medical/physician context. The sender is asking who to 'strike' between two doctors, indicating this is about selecting or rejecting medical evaluators.
Who should I strike? 1. Gennady Musher 2. Jennifer O'Day Thanks for all reponses. Joe Kritzer Torrance, Ca
AI Analysis:
The message does not mention 'musher' at all. It discusses a PTP who is an ENT doctor and mentions 'Dr. Franklin' for a Section 4050 exam, but there is no reference to any doctor named 'musher' in any context throughout the entire message.
Philip McGuire Date: March 15, 2016 8:20:00 PM Subject: Re: Need advice please... 2nd time posting.. Conference next week Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: Phil McGuire Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Regarding the ENT, assuming the U.R. was timely, my understanding your DOR will result in your PTP having to resubmit this when you prevail @ the trial of your objection which IMR ignored. I think this is just a time-saving device. I would do it. Regarding the exam with Dr. Franklin, the Def has a right to get a Section 4050 exam if they want. But, per Reg 35 (e) (2) it is not admissible for any of the issues covered by Sections 4060 - 4062. What I did after receiving one for an "out of state client (a washout report) was to set a hearing on what purposes the report could be used for which ended up being for nothing. I'd file a Request for Expedited Trial on the issue of Def not authorizing the referral to a psyche on their MPN within 5 working days per Section 4601. -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 3/15/16, Susan Lavian (lawnet listserver) wrote: Subject: [lawnet] Need advice please... 2nd time posting.. Conference next week To: "Statewide List Service" Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2016, 9:57 AM #yiv4241299976 .yiv4241299976noresizefonts {} #yiv4241299976 @media screen and (max-width:600px)screen and ( _filtered_a ){ #yiv4241299976 #yiv4241299976MCrightSidebar {border:none !important;width:125px !important;} #yiv4241299976 #yiv4241299976MCmainContent {padding-right:0px !important;} } List: lawnet Sent By: Susan Lavian Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings My client was diagnosed with hyperacusis in his left ear. 1. The PTP, an ENT, requested authorization for tinnitus retraining therapy. UR doc an internist, denied treatment. I objected on the basis the UR doc was not an ENT. The denial of therapy was upheld by IMR. I filed DOR. The adjuster then asks the PTP to resubmit the request for authorization and UR denies again but this time the doctor is an ENT. Is this valid? 2. The PTP also requests authorization for a psychiatry consult now. I choose Dr Musher from the MPN and advise def atty and adjuster they need to provide authorization to Dr. Musher for an appt. A week later I get notice that the defense is sending my client to Dr. Jerome Franklin for the consult. Doesn't LC 4600 permit the applicant to choose the psyche? Thanks. Susan Lavian _.___.__
AI Analysis:
The message mentions 'Def struck Musher' in a legal context discussing defense actions, not medical treatment. This appears to be referring to a legal proceeding where someone named Musher was struck (likely from a witness list or similar), not discussing Musher as a treating physician. The context is entirely legal rather than medical.
"Ron Ehrman" Date: March 29, 2019 6:23:00 PM Subject: LA Psyche's Bruce Roth & Mark McDonald Reply to list Reply to sender Print List: lawnet Sent By: ron ehrman Reply To Sender Reply To List Search Settings Some mildly positive comments re: McDonald; Archives silent on Roth. FWIW: Def struck Musher. TYIA for any current info. -- Ron Ehrman, Esq. https://www.ronehrmanlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF RONALD P. EHRMAN 1930 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 505 Los Angeles, CA 90057 213.483.6300 tel 213.483.6303 fax rpe@ronehrmanlaw.com This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
AI Analysis:
The message contains only email header information (From: James Malkin, Subject: Re: psych panel, and a forwarded email header from Kenneth B. Fram). There is no mention of 'musher' anywhere in the message content, and no medical or physician-related discussion about any doctor named musher.
On Mar 11, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Kenneth B. Fram (scaaa listserver) <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> wrote:
AI Analysis:
The message contains only email header information (From: Jack Goldfarb, Subject: Re: psych panel, and a forwarded email header from Kenneth B. Fram). There is no mention of 'musher' anywhere in the message content, either as a doctor's name or in any other context.
On Mar 11, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Kenneth B. Fram (scaaa listserver) <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> wrote:
AI Analysis:
The message contains only email header information from Brian Grafstrom with subject 'Re: psychiarirc qmes so cal' and a forwarded email from Elliot S. Berkowitz via lawnet listserver. There is no mention of 'musher' anywhere in the message content, and no medical or physician-related discussion present.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 5:42 PM Elliot S. Berkowitz (lawnet listserver) < listsender@lawnet.caaa.org > wrote:
AI Analysis:
The message does not mention 'musher' at all. It's a brief email from Elliot Berkowitz with subject 'Re: psychiarirc qmes so cal' and only contains the sender's signature. No reference to the doctor being evaluated.
Sent from my iPhone Elliot S Berkowitz
AI Analysis:
The message does not contain any mention of 'musher' or any variation of that name. The message appears to be a brief email header about psychiatric QMEs in Southern California, but contains no content that mentions the doctor being evaluated.
On Sep 4, 2020, at 17:10, Elliot S. Berkowitz (lawnet listserver) <listsender@lawnet.caaa.org> wrote:
AI Analysis:
The message contains only email header information (From: Jack Goldfarb, Subject: Re: Choice of 2 good Psych QMEs, and a partial email signature). There is no mention of 'musher' anywhere in the provided message content, and no medical context or discussion about any doctor.
On Sep 20, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Christopher Tajer (scaaa listserver) < listsender@lawnet.caaa.org > wrote:
AI Analysis:
The message does not mention 'musher' or any variation of this name at all. It's a brief thank you message from Susan Lavian to Phil with no medical content or doctor references.
Thanks Phil. I appreciate the advice.
AI Analysis:
This message is entirely about legal matters - attorney fees, workers' compensation judge decisions, and legal strategy. There is no mention of 'musher' anywhere in the message, nor any discussion of medical treatment or physicians. The message is from an attorney discussing a legal case and recon filing strategy.
"Ron Ehrman, Esq." Date: July 23, 2013 4:49:00 PM Subject: URGENT- 2HRS LEFT 4 RECON-ATTY FEE COST ISSUE-SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? Reply to list Reply to sender Print Attachments: ramirez, j. f&a opinion on decision ar-m550n_20130630_180431.pdf (275 K) ramirez. jose recon july 23, 2013-f450.doc (185 K) List: lawnet Sent by: ron ehrman Search Would appreciate thoughts of all those currently online til 4:15 pm please on fence re: attached. F&A where WCJ awarded me $25K in atty fees as costs per l.c 4062.3, after recon of original $2&K award and further trial. Have attached my recon; its ready to file @ WCAB . Def has efiled their recon but I haven't seen. Am LEANING TOWARD NOT FILING- JUST ANSWERING AND INCORPORATING-SAYING DEF OPENED DOOR. Am considering political climate, earning goodwill w/ WCJ who will likely pile on Def in report. This way I don't distract him from that. Esp. since we will likely both loose Recon. Award was by our best WCJ"s and one of few who will enforce a cost issue. Can likely make my $ 6 mos from now when their writ is denied; at least I should get some more costs, there. Thanks for all thoughts. Ron Ehrman, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF RONALD P. EHRMAN 1930 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 505 Los Angeles, CA 90057 213.483.6300 tel 213.483.6303 fax rpe@ronehrmanlaw.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information . Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.